Keith in America kindly alerted me to the ongoing row in Soldier Magazine. In the latest episode, a Lt Col (Retd) and SO2 at teh Medals Offices wrote:
"The main issue surrounds the fact that it represents a double award for the same period of service. Barring the gap between July 1960 and December 1962, all recipients of the PJM were also awarded a General Service Medal." (http://www.soldiermagazine.co.uk/mail_archive/medals.htm#feb ).
One person has already responded at http://www.soldiermagazine.co.uk/mail_archive/medals.htm#mar3 pointing out the Colonel's misleading info.
I have now responded as follows:
Sir,
Ongoing row over medals
In the February and March Talkbacks there is reference to the ongoing row over medals and the position of the PJM. One of the reasons why the row goes on and on is the sort of misinformation that is contained in the 'authoritative' response from your contributor Lt Col (Retd) Peter Lockyer, an SO2 at the Medal Office. He is not correct about the eligibility dates for the GSM in Malaya/Malaysia, Borneo and Singapore. In fact he is fundamentally wrong and provides readers with a misleading statement about the PJM that should be corrected. For the record, the correct dates (omitting Brunei which is not covered by the PJM) are:
Naval General Service Medal 1915-62, Clasp "Malaya" 16/06/1948 - 31/07/1960 This medal appears never to have been awarded to RN ships personnel after 1954, and particularly for the PJM period between 1957 and 1960 (see Admiralty Fleet Order (AFO) 2460 in September 1960)
General Service Medal (Army and RAF) 1918-62, Clasp "Malaya" 16/06/1948 - 31/07/1960
General Service Medal 1964. Clasp "Borneo" 24/12/1962 - 11/08/1966 and Clasp "Malay Peninsula" 17/08/1964 - 12/06/1965 (mainland) and 11/08/1966 air and coastal waters.
The PJM is issued for the period August 1957 to August 1966. For 5 ½ years of those years no British medal was awarded to those serving solely in Singapore. After July 1960, a British medal was awarded for a period of only 1 year 10 months for those serving solely on the Peninsula compared with the PJM eligibility period of over 6 years.
The dates shown above clearly indicate that only the minority of those eligible for the PJM are also eligible for British awards and not, as Lt Col Lockyer and the Medal Office, suggest. In all fairness to those who served in the Far East between 1957 and 1966, particularly the majority who do not have a medal to show for their service, I very much hope he will correct his statement.
It is no wonder recipients of the PJM and others are still having to campaign for a just hearing!
Yours sincerely,
Barry Fleming
(name and address, and telephone number supplied)
If you want to write, the email address is mail@soldiermagazine.co.uk ... please send us copies!
_________________
BarryF, who fought for the Right to Wear the Pingat Jasa Malaysia